I find it hard to look at these figures as predictive/causal of winning. Is a team that has been making more shots (and allowing less) over this short sample actually performing better, or just lucky?
Of course, you addressed this in your caveats. I’m curious how much predictive value you personally think eFG% has in this context.
I find it hard to look at these figures as predictive/causal of winning. Is a team that has been making more shots (and allowing less) over this short sample actually performing better, or just lucky?
Of course, you addressed this in your caveats. I’m curious how much predictive value you personally think eFG% has in this context.